By the time the framework was fully in place, the original motivation had transformed into trying to building a way to study micromovements consistently. Putting happened to be a perfect test case, being slow and sensitive to small variations.
This approach opens up different questions: How does motion structure change under pressure or fatigue? Are equipment changes reflected more in motion patterns than in immediate outcomes? These questions could potentially be answered with the framework.
Also, it suggests that evaluation doesn’t have to start with human judgment/classification of strokes. By letting motion speak first, we can get a clearer picture of what is happening before assigning meaning.